Re: [OT] Tom's/Marc's spam filters?

From: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
To: Will Trillich <will(at)serensoft(dot)com>
Cc: pgsql-general(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: [OT] Tom's/Marc's spam filters?
Date: 2004-04-20 05:06:18
Message-ID: 4119.1082437578@sss.pgh.pa.us
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-general

Will Trillich <will(at)serensoft(dot)com> writes:
> is there some way of getting a look at tom's or marc's filters? i could
> sure use a bit of help there. lordy, we're close to drowing in the
> stuff!

Tell me about it :-(

I currently use four levels of filtering:

1. DNSBL lists: blackholes.five-ten-sg.com, bl.spamcop.net, relays.ordb.org
(there are others out there, but these seem to have a good impedance
match to my personal spam load).

2. Private blacklist of IP ranges that have sent me too much spam.
sendmail has a pretty easy mechanism to support this, although it
only seems to support /8 /16 or /24 ranges which is a bit coarse.
(If you've gotten a "Go away spammer" bounce from me, you were caught
by this filter --- let me know and I'll tighten the ranges.)

3. I have noticed that bouncing any machine that sends "HELO
sss.pgh.pa.us" gets rid of a ton of spam and viruses. I don't know of
any real clean way to do this, but I have a sendmail.cf hack for it.

4. Very long list of procmail filters on header and body patterns.

#2 and #4 are fairly personal, in the sense that they have a decent
success/failure ratio for the junk mail I get. I wouldn't recommend
that someone else try my lists, and in any case they take a heck of a
lot of hand maintenance. I've been looking into more automated methods
such as CRM114 but haven't made the jump yet.

regards, tom lane

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-general by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Jim Wilson 2004-04-20 05:35:51 Re: [OT] Tom's/Marc's spam filters?
Previous Message Robert Creager 2004-04-20 04:43:00 Re: [OT] Tom's/Marc's spam filters?