Re: data-checksums

From: "Rakesh Kumar" <rakeshkumar464(at)mail(dot)com>
To: "Stephen Frost" <sfrost(at)snowman(dot)net>
Cc: "pgsql-general(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org" <pgsql-general(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: data-checksums
Date: 2018-01-09 17:58:41
Message-ID: trinity-9ae7ee48-40c7-4820-ac76-c53e606435ab-1515520721430@3c-app-mailcom-lxa16
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-general


> That said, imv anyway, the performance hit is small and having checksums
> is well worth it.

I also would like to believe that the hit is small, but when PG official document writes "noticeable performance penalty", it becomes difficult to convince management that the hit is small :-)

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-general by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Andres Freund 2018-01-09 18:39:24 Re: data-checksums
Previous Message Stephen Frost 2018-01-09 17:54:10 Re: data-checksums