Re: data-checksums

From: Andres Freund <andres(at)anarazel(dot)de>
To: Rakesh Kumar <rakeshkumar464(at)mail(dot)com>
Cc: Stephen Frost <sfrost(at)snowman(dot)net>, "pgsql-general(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org" <pgsql-general(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: data-checksums
Date: 2018-01-09 18:39:24
Message-ID: 20180109183924.gmqo4ltdj7oxltla@alap3.anarazel.de
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-general

On 2018-01-09 18:58:41 +0100, Rakesh Kumar wrote:
>
> > That said, imv anyway, the performance hit is small and having checksums
> > is well worth it.
>
> I also would like to believe that the hit is small, but when PG
> official document writes "noticeable performance penalty", it becomes
> difficult to convince management that the hit is small :-)

noticeable != huge.

- Andres

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-general by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Alvaro Herrera 2018-01-09 18:41:49 Re: data-checksums
Previous Message Rakesh Kumar 2018-01-09 17:58:41 Re: data-checksums