From: | Andres Freund <andres(at)anarazel(dot)de> |
---|---|
To: | Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> |
Cc: | Thomas Munro <thomas(dot)munro(at)gmail(dot)com>, Andy Fan <zhihuifan1213(at)163(dot)com>, pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org, Noah Misch <noah(at)leadboat(dot)com>, Michael Paquier <michael(dot)paquier(at)gmail(dot)com> |
Subject: | Re: GetRelationPath() vs critical sections |
Date: | 2025-02-24 15:50:21 |
Message-ID: | qhptvplcvag5kohfvkcclxgz7lllplrfnvsw4glzmvqxsfos5b@j2etjzjaroyw |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
Hi,
On 2025-02-20 15:28:39 -0500, Andres Freund wrote:
> On 2025-02-20 14:11:16 -0500, Tom Lane wrote:
> > As a matter of style, I wonder if it'd be better to have these
> > functions write into a caller-supplied variable.
>
> I wondered about that too, it does however make some code more awkward,
> e.g. because there's not a good surrounding block to put the variable in.
>
> I mildly prefer the return-by-value approach, but not more.
Since I've not heard anything on that point, I'm currently thinking with going
with return-by-value. Attached are two very mildly updated patches. Most of
the changes is added commit messages.
Greetings,
Andres Freund
Attachment | Content-Type | Size |
---|---|---|
v3-0001-Change-relpath-et-al-to-return-path-by-value.patch | text/x-diff | 31.9 KB |
v3-0002-Change-_mdfd_segpath-to-return-paths-by-value.patch | text/x-diff | 5.9 KB |
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Peter Eisentraut | 2025-02-24 16:04:36 | Re: Redact user password on pg_stat_statements |
Previous Message | Andrew Jackson | 2025-02-24 15:38:31 | Re: Add Option To Check All Addresses For Matching target_session_attr |