Re: GetRelationPath() vs critical sections

From: Andres Freund <andres(at)anarazel(dot)de>
To: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
Cc: Thomas Munro <thomas(dot)munro(at)gmail(dot)com>, Andy Fan <zhihuifan1213(at)163(dot)com>, pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org, Noah Misch <noah(at)leadboat(dot)com>, Michael Paquier <michael(dot)paquier(at)gmail(dot)com>
Subject: Re: GetRelationPath() vs critical sections
Date: 2025-02-25 14:24:00
Message-ID: b6vveqz6r3wno66rho5lqi6z5kyhfgtvi3jcodyq5rlpp3cu44@c6dsgf3z7yhs
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

Hi,

On 2025-02-24 10:50:21 -0500, Andres Freund wrote:
> Since I've not heard anything on that point, I'm currently thinking with going
> with return-by-value. Attached are two very mildly updated patches. Most of
> the changes is added commit messages.

And pushed.

Greetings,

Andres Freund

In response to

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Jelte Fennema-Nio 2025-02-25 14:28:20 Re: Make query cancellation keys longer
Previous Message Aleksander Alekseev 2025-02-25 14:18:40 Re: [PATCH] Refactor SLRU to always use long file names