| From: | Harald Fuchs <hf118(at)protecting(dot)net> |
|---|---|
| To: | pgsql-general(at)postgresql(dot)org |
| Subject: | Re: SCO Extortion |
| Date: | 2004-01-21 13:24:42 |
| Message-ID: | pu3ca94ep1.fsf@srv.protecting.net |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-general |
In article <20040121005127(dot)T930(at)ganymede(dot)hub(dot)org>,
"Marc G. Fournier" <scrappy(at)postgresql(dot)org> writes:
> On Tue, 20 Jan 2004, Gavin M. Roy wrote:
>> Thanks for the feedback thus far. I should also mention I use freebsd
>> for other stuff, but I am mainly asking in peoples experience, which is
>> the best for PostgreSQL to live on specifically. In terms of a nice smp
>> high end scsi system. Sorry for the lack of specifics on that before.
> Again, its pretty much a personal opinion ... we use FreeBSD for all our
> PgSQL work, and have several clients that are doing so also, and have
> been most happy with it ..
> Again, you have to consider that with the code-sharing that happens,
> drivers and such tend to be very similar, if not identical ...
Moreover, what should prevent the SCO scumbags from molesting *BSD
users if they would succeed in destroying Linux?
There might be technical reasons to move from Linux to *BSD, but the
SCO amok run should not be a reason to do so.
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Philippe Lang | 2004-01-21 13:50:09 | Idle connections - Too many clients connected already |
| Previous Message | Bill Moran | 2004-01-21 11:59:14 | Re: SCO Extortion |