From: | "Gavin M(dot) Roy" <gmr(at)ehpg(dot)net> |
---|---|
To: | Harald Fuchs <hf118(at)protecting(dot)net> |
Cc: | pgsql-general(at)postgresql(dot)org |
Subject: | Re: SCO Extortion |
Date: | 2004-01-21 18:28:23 |
Message-ID: | 400EC4C7.8060004@ehpg.net |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-general |
My problem is the threat from SCO is not from the bleachers so to speak,
but direct in writing :(
http://www.gavinroy.com/~gavinr/sco_threat.gif
Gavin
Harald Fuchs wrote:
>In article <20040121005127(dot)T930(at)ganymede(dot)hub(dot)org>,
>"Marc G. Fournier" <scrappy(at)postgresql(dot)org> writes:
>
>
>
>>On Tue, 20 Jan 2004, Gavin M. Roy wrote:
>>
>>
>>>Thanks for the feedback thus far. I should also mention I use freebsd
>>>for other stuff, but I am mainly asking in peoples experience, which is
>>>the best for PostgreSQL to live on specifically. In terms of a nice smp
>>>high end scsi system. Sorry for the lack of specifics on that before.
>>>
>>>
>
>
>
>>Again, its pretty much a personal opinion ... we use FreeBSD for all our
>>PgSQL work, and have several clients that are doing so also, and have
>>been most happy with it ..
>>
>>
>
>
>
>>Again, you have to consider that with the code-sharing that happens,
>>drivers and such tend to be very similar, if not identical ...
>>
>>
>
>Moreover, what should prevent the SCO scumbags from molesting *BSD
>users if they would succeed in destroying Linux?
>
>There might be technical reasons to move from Linux to *BSD, but the
>SCO amok run should not be a reason to do so.
>
>
>---------------------------(end of broadcast)---------------------------
>TIP 1: subscribe and unsubscribe commands go to majordomo(at)postgresql(dot)org
>
>
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Rick Gigger | 2004-01-21 18:29:08 | Re: embedded/"serverless" (Re: serverless postgresql) |
Previous Message | Rick Gigger | 2004-01-21 18:23:40 | Re: embedded/"serverless" (Re: serverless postgresql) |