Re: xml_valid function

From: John Gray <jgray(at)azuli(dot)co(dot)uk>
To: gpavlov(at)mynewplace(dot)com
Subject: Re: xml_valid function
Date: 2006-01-27 20:23:36
Message-ID: pan.2006.01.27.20.23.34.623222@azuli.co.uk
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-general

On Wed, 25 Jan 2006 17:11:04 -0800, George Pavlov wrote:

> Not sure what the correct forum for pgxml/xml2 questions is. I was
> wondering what is the definition of "valid" that the xml_valid(text)
> function that is part of that module uses? It seems different from the
> W3C definition of "valid" XML (is there an implicit DTD?) Maybe it is
> more akin to "well-formed"?
>

It is indeed well-formed. That just seemed a long name for the function!

Regards

John

In response to

Browse pgsql-general by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Roger Hand 2006-01-27 20:32:23 Re: xml_valid function
Previous Message Steve Oualline 2006-01-27 19:11:27 WAL questions