From: | "Roger Hand" <rhand(at)ragingnet(dot)com> |
---|---|
To: | "John Gray" <jgray(at)azuli(dot)co(dot)uk>, <gpavlov(at)mynewplace(dot)com>, <pgsql-general(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
Subject: | Re: xml_valid function |
Date: | 2006-01-27 20:32:23 |
Message-ID: | DB28E9B548192448A4E8C8A3C1B1E475FC322D@sj1-exch-01.us.corp.kailea.com |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-general |
John Gray wrote on
Friday, January 27, 2006 12:24 PM
> On Wed, 25 Jan 2006 17:11:04 -0800, George Pavlov wrote:
>
>> Not sure what the correct forum for pgxml/xml2 questions is. I was
>> wondering what is the definition of "valid" that the xml_valid(text)
>> function that is part of that module uses? It seems different from the
>> W3C definition of "valid" XML (is there an implicit DTD?) Maybe it is
>> more akin to "well-formed"?
>>
>
> It is indeed well-formed. That just seemed a long name for the function!
>
> John
Valid means it's been checked against, and conforms to, a DTD. If it hasn't been then it can't
be said to be valid.
-Roger
---------------------------(end of broadcast)---------------------------
TIP 4: Have you searched our list archives?
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Tom Lane | 2006-01-27 20:43:51 | Re: WAL questions |
Previous Message | John Gray | 2006-01-27 20:23:36 | Re: xml_valid function |