From: | Troels Arvin <troels(at)arvin(dot)dk> |
---|---|
To: | pgsql-patches(at)postgresql(dot)org |
Subject: | Re: SQL conformance related patch |
Date: | 2004-11-25 21:28:56 |
Message-ID: | pan.2004.11.25.21.28.55.956811@arvin.dk |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-docs pgsql-patches |
On Thu, 25 Nov 2004 22:13:01 +0100, Peter Eisentraut wrote:
> I could buy "SQL:1999", because then "SQL" would be a macro expanding to
> "ISO/IEC 9075". But I don't see how SQL-92 fits in there.
There was a naming change between SQL-92 and SQL:1999, according to the
mentioned book.
The ":" is because the standard's name has been brought in line with
ISO's naming standards. The expansion to four digits was because of the
general year-2000 trend.
>> Note 1:
>> http://books.elsevier.com/mk/default.asp?isbn=1558604561 has a
>> section on this subject.
>
> Note that this book is titled "SQL 1999 - Understanding Relational
> Language Components". Apparently, they are not sure either.
Yes, that's ironic. But I have the book right here. There is clearly a ":"
in the name on the front page, as well as in the colophon.
--
Greetings from Troels Arvin, Copenhagen, Denmark
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Simon Riggs | 2004-11-26 19:52:28 | Re: [PATCHES] SQL conformance related patch |
Previous Message | Peter Eisentraut | 2004-11-25 21:13:01 | Re: SQL conformance related patch |
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Christopher Kings-Lynne | 2004-11-26 01:34:33 | Improvement to pg_trgm readme |
Previous Message | Peter Eisentraut | 2004-11-25 21:13:01 | Re: SQL conformance related patch |