From: | Peter Eisentraut <peter_e(at)gmx(dot)net> |
---|---|
To: | Troels Arvin <troels(at)arvin(dot)dk> |
Cc: | pgsql-patches(at)postgresql(dot)org |
Subject: | Re: SQL conformance related patch |
Date: | 2004-11-25 21:13:01 |
Message-ID: | 200411252213.01890.peter_e@gmx.net |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-docs pgsql-patches |
Troels Arvin wrote:
> We have tried to use the official[1] short names:
> SQL-92
> SQL:1999
> SQL:2003
I could buy "SQL:1999", because then "SQL" would be a macro expanding to
"ISO/IEC 9075". But I don't see how SQL-92 fits in there.
> Note 1:
> http://books.elsevier.com/mk/default.asp?isbn=1558604561 has a
> section on this subject.
Note that this book is titled "SQL 1999 - Understanding Relational
Language Components". Apparently, they are not sure either.
--
Peter Eisentraut
http://developer.postgresql.org/~petere/
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Troels Arvin | 2004-11-25 21:28:56 | Re: SQL conformance related patch |
Previous Message | Troels Arvin | 2004-11-25 19:57:39 | Re: SQL conformance related patch |
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Troels Arvin | 2004-11-25 21:28:56 | Re: SQL conformance related patch |
Previous Message | Troels Arvin | 2004-11-25 19:57:39 | Re: SQL conformance related patch |