| From: | Pavan Deolasee <pavan(dot)deolasee(at)gmail(dot)com> |
|---|---|
| To: | Alvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)commandprompt(dot)com> |
| Cc: | Bruce Momjian <bruce(at)momjian(dot)us>, Magnus Hagander <magnus(at)hagander(dot)net>, Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>, Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com>, pgsql-hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
| Subject: | Re: should I post the patch as committed? |
| Date: | 2010-04-22 06:35:24 |
| Message-ID: | p2n2e78013d1004212335pe24d81afz1c86b802cca13914@mail.gmail.com |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
On Tue, Apr 20, 2010 at 10:41 PM, Alvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)commandprompt(dot)com
> wrote:
>
>
>
> I think committing a patch from a non-regular is a special case and
> attaching the modified patch is reasonable in that case.
>
> My 8.8 Richter ...
>
>
Or may be just mention the commit id for easy look up in the git log.
Thanks,
Pavan
--
Pavan Deolasee
EnterpriseDB http://www.enterprisedb.com
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Simon Riggs | 2010-04-22 06:56:39 | Re: testing HS/SR - 1 vs 2 performance |
| Previous Message | Heikki Linnakangas | 2010-04-22 05:57:43 | Re: testing HS/SR - 1 vs 2 performance |