Re: why postgresql over other RDBMS

From: PFC <lists(at)peufeu(dot)com>
To: "Alvaro Herrera" <alvherre(at)commandprompt(dot)com>, "A(dot)M(dot)" <agentm(at)themactionfaction(dot)com>
Cc: "pgsql-general general" <pgsql-general(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: why postgresql over other RDBMS
Date: 2007-05-24 22:12:34
Message-ID: op.tsuqm8nzcigqcu@apollo13
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-general


>> Indeed. Wouldn't it be a cool feature to persists transaction states
>> across connections so that a new connection could get access to a sub-
>> transaction state? That way, you could make your schema changes and
>> test them with any number of test clients (which designate the state
>> to connect with) and then you would commit when everything works.

Actually you can hack this by starting your webserver with only 1 thread,
use persistent connections, and disable all commits in the application.
But I'd call that "a very hackish hack".

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-general by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message A.M. 2007-05-24 22:14:58 Re: why postgresql over other RDBMS
Previous Message Kimball Bighorse 2007-05-24 22:00:52