From: | "Russ Brown" <pickscrape(at)gmail(dot)com> |
---|---|
To: | pgsql-general(at)postgresql(dot)org |
Subject: | Re: PostgreSQL's bug tracker |
Date: | 2005-10-11 17:14:37 |
Message-ID: | op.syhrinic2ilifp@localhost |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-general |
On Mon, 10 Oct 2005 23:23:45 -0700, Tino Wildenhain <tino(at)wildenhain(dot)de>
wrote:
> But trac (http://www.edgewall.com/trac/ ) does support it. I'm running
> it for quite a time and very much like it. Of course, trac is SVN only,
> so this might be a show stopper unfortunately :(
>
> Regards
> Tino
>
>
> ---------------------------(end of broadcast)---------------------------
> TIP 5: don't forget to increase your free space map settings
Trac is *very* nice. We're using it in combination with SVK: branching
made easy.
Trac's source/revision browser is excellent and SVK's merge tracking is
fast and very easy. I can't comment on the PostgreSQL implementation
though as we've been using it for quite a while: well before that came in
so we're still on the SQLite backend.
Has there ever been any discussion about moving away from CVS? We couldn't
possibly go back to it now.
--
Russ
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Rafael Montoya | 2005-10-11 17:24:12 | Re: exceptions |
Previous Message | Alex Stapleton | 2005-10-11 17:01:55 | Re: Cluster/redundancy question |