Re: PostgreSQL's bug tracker

From: "Russ Brown" <pickscrape(at)gmail(dot)com>
To: pgsql-general(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: PostgreSQL's bug tracker
Date: 2005-10-11 17:14:37
Message-ID: op.syhrinic2ilifp@localhost
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-general

On Mon, 10 Oct 2005 23:23:45 -0700, Tino Wildenhain <tino(at)wildenhain(dot)de>
wrote:
> But trac (http://www.edgewall.com/trac/ ) does support it. I'm running
> it for quite a time and very much like it. Of course, trac is SVN only,
> so this might be a show stopper unfortunately :(
>
> Regards
> Tino
>
>
> ---------------------------(end of broadcast)---------------------------
> TIP 5: don't forget to increase your free space map settings

Trac is *very* nice. We're using it in combination with SVK: branching
made easy.

Trac's source/revision browser is excellent and SVK's merge tracking is
fast and very easy. I can't comment on the PostgreSQL implementation
though as we've been using it for quite a while: well before that came in
so we're still on the SQLite backend.

Has there ever been any discussion about moving away from CVS? We couldn't
possibly go back to it now.

--

Russ

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-general by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Rafael Montoya 2005-10-11 17:24:12 Re: exceptions
Previous Message Alex Stapleton 2005-10-11 17:01:55 Re: Cluster/redundancy question