Re: PostgreSQL's bug tracker

From: Tino Wildenhain <tino(at)wildenhain(dot)de>
To: "Jim C(dot) Nasby" <jnasby(at)pervasive(dot)com>
Cc: "Joshua D(dot) Drake" <jd(at)commandprompt(dot)com>, J B <jbwellsiv(at)gmail(dot)com>, pgsql-general(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: PostgreSQL's bug tracker
Date: 2005-10-11 06:23:45
Message-ID: 1129011825.18052.67.camel@Andrea.peacock.de
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-general

Am Montag, den 10.10.2005, 19:33 -0500 schrieb Jim C. Nasby:
> On Mon, Oct 10, 2005 at 05:20:13PM -0700, Joshua D. Drake wrote:
> > J B wrote:
...
> IIRC the last time this was brought up it was violently shot-down on
> -hackers (and the fact that bugzilla didn't directly support PostgreSQL
> back then had nothing to do with it).

But trac (http://www.edgewall.com/trac/ ) does support it. I'm running
it for quite a time and very much like it. Of course, trac is SVN only,
so this might be a show stopper unfortunately :(

Regards
Tino

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-general by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Tino Wildenhain 2005-10-11 06:25:53 Re: PostgreSQL's bug tracker
Previous Message Tom Lane 2005-10-11 06:22:23 Re: Dumb question about serial's upper limit