From: | Andres Freund <andres(at)anarazel(dot)de> |
---|---|
To: | Paul Ramsey <pramsey(at)cleverelephant(dot)ca> |
Cc: | PostgreSQL Hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>, Nathan Bossart <nathandbossart(at)gmail(dot)com> |
Subject: | Re: Converting pqsignal to void return |
Date: | 2025-01-22 17:01:01 |
Message-ID: | moawtxi6zza5wsvrs7y2p5yhff46vla5eivusqhgqhr5reyvih@xu34av5xxi3s |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
Hi,
On 2025-01-22 11:50:30 -0500, Andres Freund wrote:
> On 2025-01-22 07:57:52 -0800, Paul Ramsey wrote:
> > It is possible we have been Doing It Wrong all this time, and would love some pointers on the right way to do this.
>
> All your interrupt handler is doing "for you" is setting
> http_interrupt_requested, right? Why do you need that variable? Seems you
> could just check postgres' QueryCancelPending? And perhaps ProcDiePending, if
> you want to handle termination too.
FWIW, the even better approach in this case probably would be to use curl in a
non-blocking manner. Then you can do all the blocking in a loop around
WaitLatchOrSocket (or, for slightly improved efficiency, create a wait event
and wait with WaitEventSetWait()) and react to interrupts with
CHECK_FOR_INTERRUPTS() like normal postgres code.
Greetings,
Andres Freund
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Paul Ramsey | 2025-01-22 17:01:09 | Re: Converting pqsignal to void return |
Previous Message | Alexander Kuzmenkov | 2025-01-22 16:50:37 | Re: Quadratic planning time for ordered paths over partitioned tables |