Re: Quadratic planning time for ordered paths over partitioned tables

From: Alexander Kuzmenkov <akuzmenkov(at)timescale(dot)com>
To: Alvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)alvh(dot)no-ip(dot)org>
Cc: pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: Quadratic planning time for ordered paths over partitioned tables
Date: 2025-01-22 16:50:37
Message-ID: CALzhyqzvYqaZ9iaOQOpV2Ga=h4549UfaU6BFDNOpTU+scgnRUA@mail.gmail.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On Wed, Jan 22, 2025 at 5:36 PM Alvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)alvh(dot)no-ip(dot)org> wrote:
> I think this is closely related to the work Yuya Watari has been doing
> at
> https://postgr.es/m/CAJ2pMkZZHrhgQ5UV0y+STKqx7XVGzENMhL98UbKM-OArvK9dmA@mail.gmail.com
> Perhaps you could contribute by reviewing that patch series.

Yeah, I'm referencing this one in my email, but it's a series of
patches that does a major refactoring changing thousands of lines. I'm
not sure when or if it's going to land, do you think applying a quick
fix first would make sense? It makes trivial changes in one function.

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Andres Freund 2025-01-22 17:01:01 Re: Converting pqsignal to void return
Previous Message Andres Freund 2025-01-22 16:50:30 Re: Converting pqsignal to void return