Anyone know why PostgreSQL doesn't support 2 phase execution?

From:	"Ron Peacetree" <rjpeace(at)earthlink(dot)net>
To:	pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject:	Anyone know why PostgreSQL doesn't support 2 phase execution?
Date:	2003-04-05 16:35:30
Message-ID:	mBDja.9624$ey1.803737@newsread1.prod.itd.earthlink.net
Views:	Whole Thread | Raw Message | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:	2003-04-05 16:35:30 from "Ron Peacetree" <rjpeace(at)earthlink(dot)net>  2003-04-07 17:11:44 from Rod Taylor <rbt(at)rbt(dot)ca>   2003-04-07 18:59:21 from "Ron Peacetree" <rjpeace(at)earthlink(dot)net>    2003-04-08 19:54:50 from Neil Conway <neilc(at)samurai(dot)com>    2003-04-09 14:13:45 from Jan Wieck <JanWieck(at)Yahoo(dot)com>     2003-04-09 16:35:20 from "Ron Peacetree" <rjpeace(at)earthlink(dot)net>  2003-04-07 19:44:06 from cbbrowne(at)cbbrowne(dot)com
Lists:	pgsql-hackers

Responses

• Re: Anyone know why PostgreSQL doesn't support 2 phase execution? at 2003-04-07 17:11:44 from Rod Taylor
• Re: Anyone know why PostgreSQL doesn't support 2 phase execution? at 2003-04-07 19:44:06 from cbbrowne

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

	From	Date	Subject
Next Message	Ron Peacetree	2003-04-05 16:35:35	Anyone working on better transaction locking?
Previous Message	Jon Jensen	2003-04-05 14:23:25	Re: more contrib: log rotator