Re: Anyone know why PostgreSQL doesn't support 2 phase execution?

From: Rod Taylor <rbt(at)rbt(dot)ca>
To: Ron Peacetree <rjpeace(at)earthlink(dot)net>
Cc: PostgreSQL Development <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: Anyone know why PostgreSQL doesn't support 2 phase execution?
Date: 2003-04-07 17:11:44
Message-ID: 1049735504.40144.35.camel@jester
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On Sat, 2003-04-05 at 11:35, Ron Peacetree wrote:
> ...and what kind of performance hit we take (and under what
> circumstances) for not having it?

Do you mean 2-phase commits? If so, how do you take a performance hit
from *not* having it? PostgreSQL doesn't have it (prepare & forget
phases)) simply because nobody has completed and submitted an
implementation. Satoshi is working on the problem.

If not, what do you mean by 2 phase execution?

--
Rod Taylor <rbt(at)rbt(dot)ca>

PGP Key: http://www.rbt.ca/rbtpub.asc

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message cbbrowne 2003-04-07 17:40:41 Re: more contrib: log rotator
Previous Message Peter Eisentraut 2003-04-07 17:06:07 Re: more contrib: log rotator