From: | Doug McNaught <doug(at)wireboard(dot)com> |
---|---|
To: | Peter Eisentraut <peter_e(at)gmx(dot)net> |
Cc: | Linh Luong <linh(dot)luong(at)computalog(dot)com>, <pgsql-general(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
Subject: | Re: Why is it not using the other processor? |
Date: | 2001-07-05 16:05:16 |
Message-ID: | m3elrv8ipv.fsf@belphigor.mcnaught.org |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-general |
Peter Eisentraut <peter_e(at)gmx(dot)net> writes:
> Linh Luong writes:
>
> > My postgres is running on a dual processor. But when I run a query and
> > look at TOP and notice only one processor is being used. And it is
> > being used 100% (assuming only 1 process is active). Why would it
> > allocate the work to the other processor.
>
> Ask your operating system provider. PostgreSQL just allocates processes,
> it doesn't decide on what CPU they'll run.
But thre answer to his question is that a single query will use at
most 1 CPU, since each backend is a single process. Multiple
simultaneous queries will of course use all available CPUs on a
properly-setup system.
-Doug
--
The rain man gave me two cures; he said jump right in,
The first was Texas medicine--the second was just railroad gin,
And like a fool I mixed them, and it strangled up my mind,
Now people just get uglier, and I got no sense of time... --Dylan
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Tom Lane | 2001-07-05 16:05:52 | Re: Changing optimizations |
Previous Message | Daniel Åkerud | 2001-07-05 16:02:06 | Create function without return value? |