From: | Peter Eisentraut <peter_e(at)gmx(dot)net> |
---|---|
To: | Linh Luong <linh(dot)luong(at)computalog(dot)com> |
Cc: | <pgsql-general(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
Subject: | Re: Why is it not using the other processor? |
Date: | 2001-07-05 15:59:00 |
Message-ID: | Pine.LNX.4.30.0107051757130.677-100000@peter.localdomain |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-general |
Linh Luong writes:
> My postgres is running on a dual processor. But when I run a query and
> look at TOP and notice only one processor is being used. And it is
> being used 100% (assuming only 1 process is active). Why would it
> allocate the work to the other processor.
Ask your operating system provider. PostgreSQL just allocates processes,
it doesn't decide on what CPU they'll run.
> One more question. I am using the browser to display my data. If I
> start the query by means of pressing the Search button and then I decide
> to stop the search by pressing STOP (on the broswer). The browser stop
> executing and I can still surf the web. My question is why is the
> process that handles the search still running when I view TOP.
You are probably using PHP with persistent connections. They could stay
open indefinitely. You might have to kill the postgres process or the web
server manually.
--
Peter Eisentraut peter_e(at)gmx(dot)net http://funkturm.homeip.net/~peter
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Daniel Åkerud | 2001-07-05 16:02:06 | Create function without return value? |
Previous Message | martin.chantler | 2001-07-05 15:53:14 | Re: Re: Red Hat to support PostgreSQL |