From: | Doug McNaught <doug(at)mcnaught(dot)org> |
---|---|
To: | pilsl(at)goldfisch(dot)at |
Cc: | pgsql-general(at)postgresql(dot)org |
Subject: | Re: 7.2.3: tuple is too big (max 8136) |
Date: | 2002-11-04 00:19:56 |
Message-ID: | m3adkq424z.fsf@varsoon.wireboard.com |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-general pgsql-sql |
pilsl(at)goldfisch(dot)at writes:
> On Fri, Nov 01, 2002 at 08:50:54AM -0500, Doug McNaught wrote:
> >
> > It's possible you are hitting the maximum column limit rather than the
> > tuple size limit. The FAQ list the max columns in a table as:
> >
> > "250-1600 depending on column types"
> >
>
> I already created the table with 1600 cols of varchar(30) so this
> should not be the limit. And the errormessage is clearly talking about
> the tuples size. (which should not have such a limit in 7.2.3).
Well, it does say "depending on column type". Perhaps it is giving a
valid error but the wrong message. The 8k tuple-size limit is
definitely gone in modern versions of PG (since 7.1 I believe) so I
don't see why that error message should appear.
-Doug
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Justin Clift | 2002-11-04 00:21:31 | OT : Anyone know what's happened to Gandi.net? |
Previous Message | pilsl | 2002-11-04 00:11:06 | Re: 7.2.3: tuple is too big (max 8136) |
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Stephan Szabo | 2002-11-04 00:38:45 | Re: 7.2.3: tuple is too big (max 8136) |
Previous Message | pilsl | 2002-11-04 00:11:06 | Re: 7.2.3: tuple is too big (max 8136) |