From: | Stephan Szabo <sszabo(at)megazone23(dot)bigpanda(dot)com> |
---|---|
To: | <pilsl(at)goldfisch(dot)at> |
Cc: | Doug McNaught <doug(at)mcnaught(dot)org>, <pgsql-general(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
Subject: | Re: 7.2.3: tuple is too big (max 8136) |
Date: | 2002-11-04 00:38:45 |
Message-ID: | 20021103162643.V91168-100000@megazone23.bigpanda.com |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-general pgsql-sql |
On Mon, 4 Nov 2002 pilsl(at)goldfisch(dot)at wrote:
> On Fri, Nov 01, 2002 at 08:50:54AM -0500, Doug McNaught wrote:
> >
> > It's possible you are hitting the maximum column limit rather than the
> > tuple size limit. The FAQ list the max columns in a table as:
> >
> > "250-1600 depending on column types"
> >
>
> I already created the table with 1600 cols of varchar(30) so this
> should not be the limit. And the errormessage is clearly talking about
> the tuples size. (which should not have such a limit in 7.2.3).
Technically there is still a tuple size limit. It's just that many types
can be pulled out of the main storage of the table and you get a reference
to its value in the main storage rather than the value itself. That's how
the 8k limit was circumvented. The tuple size limit is part of why
there's a maximum column count, AFAIK the main tuple still needs to fit in
one page. The create table may succeed even if it's not possible to
actually insert non-null values in every column (for example, make a table
with 1400 int8 columns, if you try to insert values into each column,
it will fail. If you try to insert say only a few values and alot of
nulls, it works).
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Tom Lane | 2002-11-04 02:09:35 | Re: Couple quick questions.... |
Previous Message | Justin Clift | 2002-11-04 00:21:31 | OT : Anyone know what's happened to Gandi.net? |
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Tom Lane | 2002-11-04 02:19:54 | Re: 7.2.3: tuple is too big (max 8136) |
Previous Message | Doug McNaught | 2002-11-04 00:19:56 | Re: 7.2.3: tuple is too big (max 8136) |