Re: Design Strategy WAS: High-Profile Advocacy Opportunity:VbulletinForum

From: Christopher Browne <cbbrowne(at)acm(dot)org>
To: pgsql-advocacy(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: Design Strategy WAS: High-Profile Advocacy Opportunity:VbulletinForum
Date: 2004-06-24 21:43:12
Message-ID: m3659gvdhr.fsf@wolfe.cbbrowne.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-advocacy

Martha Stewart called it a Good Thing when josh(at)agliodbs(dot)com (Josh Berkus) wrote:
> "Database independence" is a strategy which is suitable for a
> limited class of web applications, and not much else.

Well, SAP has pretty consistently tried to apply this strategy to
their R/3 application, which is _not_ a "limited class of web
applications."

Now, the way they have implemented "database independence" does mean
that they have had to implement all data validation in their
applications, with the result that it takes years for the code to
mature, so it is certainly not immune to criticism ;-). But it's
getting used by "Fortune 500" types, so it sure seems to be a
counterexample to your claim...
--
let name="cbbrowne" and tld="acm.org" in name ^ "@" ^ tld;;
http://cbbrowne.com/info/lsf.html
Rules of the Evil Overlord #210. "All guest-quarters will be bugged
and monitored so that I can keep track of what the visitors I have for
some reason allowed to roam about my fortress are actually plotting."
<http://www.eviloverlord.com/>

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-advocacy by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Thomas Hallgren 2004-06-24 21:45:22 Re: Design Strategy WAS: High-Profile Advocacy Opportunity:VbulletinForum
Previous Message Robert Treat 2004-06-24 21:31:50 Re: Design Strategy WAS: High-Profile Advocacy