Re: Design Strategy WAS: High-Profile Advocacy Opportunity:VbulletinForum

From: Thomas Hallgren <thhal(at)mailblocks(dot)com>
To: Josh Berkus <josh(at)agliodbs(dot)com>
Cc: pgsql-advocacy(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: Design Strategy WAS: High-Profile Advocacy Opportunity:VbulletinForum
Date: 2004-06-24 21:45:22
Message-ID: 40DB4B72.4010407@mailblocks.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-advocacy

Josh,

There's no disagreement. I'm definitely in type #1 and yes, in order to
get a good abstraction, you do need to spend time and resources. A
project directed to a single customer seldom (almost never) have that
luxury. An ISV who wants to please as large customer base as possible,
might. The latter is also true for people like myself who deal with
tools and infrastructure aimed primarily towards ISV's and organisations
that do their own development.

Kind regards,

Thomas Hallgren

In response to

Browse pgsql-advocacy by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Josh Berkus 2004-06-25 00:00:15 Re: Design Strategy WAS: High-Profile Advocacy Opportunity:VbulletinForum
Previous Message Christopher Browne 2004-06-24 21:43:12 Re: Design Strategy WAS: High-Profile Advocacy Opportunity:VbulletinForum