| From: | Christopher Browne <cbbrowne(at)acm(dot)org> |
|---|---|
| To: | pgsql-performance(at)postgresql(dot)org |
| Subject: | Re: PostgreSQL vs. Oracle vs. Microsoft |
| Date: | 2005-01-10 23:57:25 |
| Message-ID: | m31xcset22.fsf@knuth.knuth.cbbrowne.com |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-performance |
Oops! lists(at)boutiquenumerique(dot)com (Pierre-Frédéric Caillaud) was seen spray-painting on a wall:
>> The .NET Runtime will be a part of the next MS SQLServer engine. You
>> will be able to have C# as a pl in the database engine with the next
>> version of MSSQL. That certainly will be something to think about.
>
> Ah, well, if it's C# (or even VB.NET) then it's serious !
> I thought postgres had pl/java ?
Someone's working on pl/Mono...
<http://gborg.postgresql.org/project/plmono/projdisplay.php>
--
"cbbrowne","@","gmail.com"
http://cbbrowne.com/info/slony.html
"... the open research model is justified. There is a passage in the
Bible (John 8:32, and on a plaque in CIA HQ), "And ye shall know the
truth, and the truth shall set ye free." -- Dave Dittrich
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Dave Cramer | 2005-01-11 00:04:37 | Re: PostgreSQL vs. Oracle vs. Microsoft |
| Previous Message | Jim C. Nasby | 2005-01-10 23:29:52 | Re: PostgreSQL vs. Oracle vs. Microsoft |