| From: | "Jim C(dot) Nasby" <decibel(at)decibel(dot)org> |
|---|---|
| To: | alex(at)neteconomist(dot)com |
| Cc: | Frank Wiles <frank(at)wiles(dot)org>, Yann Michel <yann-postgresql(at)spline(dot)de>, gpd(at)gpdnet(dot)co(dot)uk, pgsql-performance(at)postgresql(dot)org |
| Subject: | Re: PostgreSQL vs. Oracle vs. Microsoft |
| Date: | 2005-01-10 23:29:52 |
| Message-ID: | 20050110232952.GG67721@decibel.org |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-performance |
On Mon, Jan 10, 2005 at 12:46:01PM -0500, Alex Turner wrote:
> You sir are correct! You can't use perl in MS-SQL or Oracle ;).
On the other hand, PL/SQL is incredibly powerful, especially combined
with all the tools/utilities that come with Oracle. I think you'd be
hard-pressed to find too many real-world examples where you could do
something with a PostgreSQL procedural language that you couldn't do
with PL/SQL.
--
Jim C. Nasby, Database Consultant decibel(at)decibel(dot)org
Give your computer some brain candy! www.distributed.net Team #1828
Windows: "Where do you want to go today?"
Linux: "Where do you want to go tomorrow?"
FreeBSD: "Are you guys coming, or what?"
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Christopher Browne | 2005-01-10 23:57:25 | Re: PostgreSQL vs. Oracle vs. Microsoft |
| Previous Message | Gary Doades | 2005-01-10 21:55:57 | Re: PostgreSQL vs. Oracle vs. Microsoft |