| From: | Dimitri Fontaine <dfontaine(at)hi-media(dot)com> |
|---|---|
| To: | Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> |
| Cc: | Merlin Moncure <mmoncure(at)gmail(dot)com>, Andrew Dunstan <andrew(at)dunslane(dot)net>, Petr Jelinek <pjmodos(at)pjmodos(dot)net>, PostgreSQL-development <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>, Alvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)commandprompt(dot)com> |
| Subject: | Re: Anonymous code blocks |
| Date: | 2009-09-22 20:40:58 |
| Message-ID: | m2ocp23e79.fsf@hi-media.com |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> writes:
> Merlin Moncure <mmoncure(at)gmail(dot)com> writes:
>> A note about void returning functions....there are no send/recv
>> functions for the void type which will cause problems for users of
>> this feature over the binary protocol.
>
> This isn't a SELECT and doesn't return anything, so I don't see the
> issue.
I somehow had to force me into thinking about DO as a Utility command
and not a query... but I guess the previous discussion about wanting to
have a lambda construct and functions as types confused us. We're not
there yet, DO is only a utility command.
Regards,
--
dim
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Emmanuel Cecchet | 2009-09-22 22:16:33 | Re: Join optimization for inheritance tables |
| Previous Message | Tom Lane | 2009-09-22 18:27:41 | Re: Anonymous code blocks vs CREATE LANGUAGE |