Re: Anonymous code blocks

From: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
To: Merlin Moncure <mmoncure(at)gmail(dot)com>
Cc: Andrew Dunstan <andrew(at)dunslane(dot)net>, Dimitri Fontaine <dfontaine(at)hi-media(dot)com>, Petr Jelinek <pjmodos(at)pjmodos(dot)net>, PostgreSQL-development <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>, Alvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)commandprompt(dot)com>
Subject: Re: Anonymous code blocks
Date: 2009-09-22 18:26:32
Message-ID: 14196.1253643992@sss.pgh.pa.us
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

Merlin Moncure <mmoncure(at)gmail(dot)com> writes:
> A note about void returning functions....there are no send/recv
> functions for the void type which will cause problems for users of
> this feature over the binary protocol.

This isn't a SELECT and doesn't return anything, so I don't see the
issue.

regards, tom lane

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Tom Lane 2009-09-22 18:27:41 Re: Anonymous code blocks vs CREATE LANGUAGE
Previous Message Jaime Casanova 2009-09-22 17:59:52 Re: [PATCH] Largeobject access controls