Re: damage control mode

From: Dimitri Fontaine <dfontaine(at)hi-media(dot)com>
To: Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com>
Cc: Marko Tiikkaja <marko(dot)tiikkaja(at)cs(dot)helsinki(dot)fi>, Josh Berkus <josh(at)agliodbs(dot)com>, pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org, David Fetter <david(at)fetter(dot)org>
Subject: Re: damage control mode
Date: 2010-02-07 21:54:54
Message-ID: m2k4uohftd.fsf@hi-media.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com> writes:
> On Sun, Feb 7, 2010 at 4:03 PM, Dimitri Fontaine <dfontaine(at)hi-media(dot)com> wrote:
>> In case I'm not clear, what I'm saying is that I think we can consider
>> the writable CTE patch ready for commit even though we still have to
>> decide what its impacts on documentation should be.
>
> Whether a patch is ready to commit will be up to the committer

"Ready for Committer" is what I though but failed to type.

Regards,
--
dim

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Gokulakannan Somasundaram 2010-02-07 22:22:26 Re: Precedence of Postfix operators
Previous Message Robert Haas 2010-02-07 21:34:26 Re: damage control mode