From: | Dimitri Fontaine <dimitri(at)2ndQuadrant(dot)fr> |
---|---|
To: | Alvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)commandprompt(dot)com> |
Cc: | Dimitri Fontaine <dimitri(at)2ndquadrant(dot)fr>, Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com>, Simon Riggs <simon(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>, Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>, Andres Freund <andres(at)anarazel(dot)de>, Pg Hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>, Greg Smith <greg(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>, Bruce Momjian <bruce(at)momjian(dot)us> |
Subject: | Re: Command Triggers |
Date: | 2012-02-16 21:30:49 |
Message-ID: | m2ipj6sbxy.fsf@2ndQuadrant.fr |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
Alvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)commandprompt(dot)com> writes:
> I didn't like the new cmdtrigger.h file. It's included by a lot of
> other headers, and it's also itself including execnodes.h and
> parsenodes.h which means practically the whole lot of the source tree
> is included in turn. If you could split it, so that the struct
> definition is in a different file that's only included by the few .c
> files that actually use that struct, I'd be much happier.
I didn't realize that, thanks for reviewing!
> ... after looking at it more closely, I think only this line needs to be
> in a separate file:
>
> typedef struct CommandContextData *CommandContext;
>
> and that file is included by other headers; they don't need the function
> declarations or the struct definition.
I'll look into that tomorrow then. The same trick is already applied to
Relation and RelationData (resp. in src/include/utils/relcache.h and
src/include/utils/rel.h), and only now I understand why :)
Regards,
--
Dimitri Fontaine
http://2ndQuadrant.fr PostgreSQL : Expertise, Formation et Support
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Guillaume Lelarge | 2012-02-16 21:43:48 | Bug in intarray? |
Previous Message | Dimitri Fontaine | 2012-02-16 21:21:30 | Re: Command Triggers |