From: | Gunnar Rønning <gunnar(at)polygnosis(dot)com> |
---|---|
To: | merlyn(at)stonehenge(dot)com (Randal L(dot) Schwartz) |
Cc: | "Alex Knight" <knight(at)phunc(dot)com>, <pgsql-general(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
Subject: | Re: PL/java? |
Date: | 2001-09-05 12:42:24 |
Message-ID: | m2g0a1zu4v.fsf@smaug.polygnosis.com |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-general |
* merlyn(at)stonehenge(dot)com (Randal L. Schwartz) wrote:
|
| If you'd just stop saying things that can't be backed up, I wouldn't
| have to keep responding.
;-)
| Where is your proof that mod_perl is "slower than most any j2ee
| application"?
I don't like to generalize either. I've been on two projects where we
have replaced Perl applications with Java applications. The first one
was a content management system and the second was an online dating
application(like match.com)
In both cases we ended up with Java applications that performed
better than the Perl applications.
The reasons ?
- Maybe it was because our Java developers were
better than our Perl developers.
- Maybe we had learned something the second time implementing the
application. Better architecture, system design, etc.
- Maybe Java was better suited for the actual applications.
In the end there is however no proof to claim that Java applications
are faster than mod_perl applications.
But having Java in the PgSQL backend would be nice for some, regardless
of how well Java compares to Perl.
--
Gunnar Rønning - gunnar(at)polygnosis(dot)com
Senior Consultant, Polygnosis AS, http://www.polygnosis.com/
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Gunnar Rønning | 2001-09-05 12:50:26 | Re: [WAY OT] Re: PL/java? |
Previous Message | P.J. "Josh" Rovero | 2001-09-05 12:27:32 | Glacial deletes (fixed), now glacial lo vacuum |