Re: PL/java?

From: Gunnar Rønning <gunnar(at)polygnosis(dot)com>
To: merlyn(at)stonehenge(dot)com (Randal L(dot) Schwartz)
Cc: "Alex Knight" <knight(at)phunc(dot)com>, <pgsql-general(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: PL/java?
Date: 2001-09-05 12:42:24
Message-ID: m2g0a1zu4v.fsf@smaug.polygnosis.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-general

* merlyn(at)stonehenge(dot)com (Randal L. Schwartz) wrote:
|
| If you'd just stop saying things that can't be backed up, I wouldn't
| have to keep responding.

;-)

| Where is your proof that mod_perl is "slower than most any j2ee
| application"?

I don't like to generalize either. I've been on two projects where we
have replaced Perl applications with Java applications. The first one
was a content management system and the second was an online dating
application(like match.com)

In both cases we ended up with Java applications that performed
better than the Perl applications.

The reasons ?

- Maybe it was because our Java developers were
better than our Perl developers.

- Maybe we had learned something the second time implementing the
application. Better architecture, system design, etc.

- Maybe Java was better suited for the actual applications.

In the end there is however no proof to claim that Java applications
are faster than mod_perl applications.

But having Java in the PgSQL backend would be nice for some, regardless
of how well Java compares to Perl.

--
Gunnar Rønning - gunnar(at)polygnosis(dot)com
Senior Consultant, Polygnosis AS, http://www.polygnosis.com/

In response to

  • Re: PL/java? at 2001-09-04 21:28:04 from Randal L. Schwartz

Responses

  • Re: PL/java? at 2001-09-05 18:26:28 from Randal L. Schwartz

Browse pgsql-general by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Gunnar Rønning 2001-09-05 12:50:26 Re: [WAY OT] Re: PL/java?
Previous Message P.J. "Josh" Rovero 2001-09-05 12:27:32 Glacial deletes (fixed), now glacial lo vacuum