Re: PL/java?

From: merlyn(at)stonehenge(dot)com (Randal L(dot) Schwartz)
To: Gunnar Rønning <gunnar(at)polygnosis(dot)com>
Cc: "Alex Knight" <knight(at)phunc(dot)com>, <pgsql-general(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: PL/java?
Date: 2001-09-05 18:26:28
Message-ID: m11yllbijv.fsf@halfdome.holdit.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-general

>>>>> "Gunnar" == Gunnar Rønning <gunnar(at)polygnosis(dot)com> writes:

Gunnar> In the end there is however no proof to claim that Java applications
Gunnar> are faster than mod_perl applications.

I'll settle for that. Most of the time I've seen benchmarks, it's
been more the skillset of the programmers at stake rather than the
languages.

Gunnar> But having Java in the PgSQL backend would be nice for some,
Gunnar> regardless of how well Java compares to Perl.

Yes, I can support that.

--
Randal L. Schwartz - Stonehenge Consulting Services, Inc. - +1 503 777 0095
<merlyn(at)stonehenge(dot)com> <URL:http://www.stonehenge.com/merlyn/>
Perl/Unix/security consulting, Technical writing, Comedy, etc. etc.
See PerlTraining.Stonehenge.com for onsite and open-enrollment Perl training!

In response to

Browse pgsql-general by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Tomas Berndtsson 2001-09-05 18:44:40 connection failed in threaded application
Previous Message David Ford 2001-09-05 17:42:36 Hmm, did the lists go silent?