| From: | Dimitri Fontaine <dimitri(at)2ndQuadrant(dot)fr> |
|---|---|
| To: | Stephen Frost <sfrost(at)snowman(dot)net> |
| Cc: | Peter Eisentraut <peter_e(at)gmx(dot)net>, Sergey Muraviov <sergey(dot)k(dot)muraviov(at)gmail(dot)com>, PostgreSQL Hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
| Subject: | Re: extension_control_path |
| Date: | 2014-02-26 21:29:17 |
| Message-ID: | m2eh2plg0i.fsf@2ndQuadrant.fr |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
Stephen Frost <sfrost(at)snowman(dot)net> writes:
> I find this role reversal to be quite bizarre.
Who do you think should have a say about where to load the dynamic
librairies from? hackers, packagers, system admins, dbas or users?
Who do you think is currently editing the setup that decides where to
load the dynamic librairies from, which is spread into SQL scripts,
extension control file, postgresql.conf and pg_config --pkglibdir?
What exactly are you calling bizarre in the idea that the PostgreSQL
source code is maybe not the best way where to solve that problem from?
Regards,
--
Dimitri Fontaine
http://2ndQuadrant.fr PostgreSQL : Expertise, Formation et Support
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Stephen Frost | 2014-02-26 21:43:23 | Re: extension_control_path |
| Previous Message | Alexander Korotkov | 2014-02-26 21:25:26 | Re: GIN improvements part2: fast scan |