| From: | Stephen Frost <sfrost(at)snowman(dot)net> |
|---|---|
| To: | Dimitri Fontaine <dimitri(at)2ndQuadrant(dot)fr> |
| Cc: | Peter Eisentraut <peter_e(at)gmx(dot)net>, Sergey Muraviov <sergey(dot)k(dot)muraviov(at)gmail(dot)com>, PostgreSQL Hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
| Subject: | Re: extension_control_path |
| Date: | 2014-02-26 21:15:46 |
| Message-ID: | 20140226211546.GT2921@tamriel.snowman.net |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
* Dimitri Fontaine (dimitri(at)2ndQuadrant(dot)fr) wrote:
> I don't see any confusion about dynamic library name resolving added
> from the extension_control_path, I'm sorry. Simply because I don't
> expect people to use the facility without a third party software
> designed to fill-in the gap.
>
> You're saying that the backend should fill the gap, I'm saying that it
> should not. Or maybe within another patch entirely.
I find this role reversal to be quite bizarre.
Is this third-party software going to be modifying postgresql.conf too?
Thanks,
Stephen
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Alvaro Herrera | 2014-02-26 21:18:05 | Re: Another possible corruption bug in 9.3.2 or possibly a known MultiXact problem? |
| Previous Message | Dimitri Fontaine | 2014-02-26 21:09:14 | Re: extension_control_path |