Re: Re: Red Hat to support PostgreSQL

From: Gunnar Rønning <gunnar(at)polygnosis(dot)com>
To: Bruce Momjian <pgman(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us>
Cc: Lamar Owen <lamar(dot)owen(at)wgcr(dot)org>, Alex Knight <knight(at)phunc(dot)com>, Vivek Khera <khera(at)kcilink(dot)com>, pgsql-general(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: Re: Red Hat to support PostgreSQL
Date: 2001-06-27 22:10:51
Message-ID: m2d77p4lqs.fsf@smaug.polygnosis.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-general

* Bruce Momjian <pgman(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us> wrote:

| > the Linux kernel (their 'enterprise' kernel patches, for instance) -- why
| > would PostgreSQL be any different?
|
| That would concern me if it ever happened. GB hasn't done it and I hope
| RH doesn't either.
|

I think this is a good thing - it just illustrates that open source works.
For instance, there are threading patches for the linux kernel that
significantly increase the performance of multithreaded Java applications - but
last time I checked Linus hadn't bother to put them into his release of the
kernel. That doesn't prevent me from using them and that makes me all the
happier...

But I think something like this only would happen when one cannot reach
consensus on design or requirements.

--
Gunnar Rønning - gunnar(at)polygnosis(dot)com
Senior Consultant, Polygnosis AS, http://www.polygnosis.com/

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-general by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Alex Knight 2001-06-27 22:12:16 Re: Re: Red Hat to support PostgreSQL
Previous Message Steve Wolfe 2001-06-27 22:08:32 Re: Re: Red Hat to support PostgreSQL