| From: | Bruce Momjian <pgman(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us> |
|---|---|
| To: | Lamar Owen <lamar(dot)owen(at)wgcr(dot)org> |
| Cc: | Alex Knight <knight(at)phunc(dot)com>, Vivek Khera <khera(at)kcilink(dot)com>, pgsql-general(at)postgresql(dot)org |
| Subject: | Re: Re: Red Hat to support PostgreSQL |
| Date: | 2001-06-27 21:17:51 |
| Message-ID: | 200106272117.f5RLHpr23146@candle.pha.pa.us |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-general |
> However, I would be surprized if their shipped RHDB product didn't
> incorporate changes that they came up with -- even if the PostgreSQL group
> didn't apply them to the base dist. Although I certainly reserve the right
> to be wrong. Yes, I know that may not be healthy. Yet they do it now with
> the Linux kernel (their 'enterprise' kernel patches, for instance) -- why
> would PostgreSQL be any different?
That would concern me if it ever happened. GB hasn't done it and I hope
RH doesn't either.
--
Bruce Momjian | http://candle.pha.pa.us
pgman(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us | (610) 853-3000
+ If your life is a hard drive, | 830 Blythe Avenue
+ Christ can be your backup. | Drexel Hill, Pennsylvania 19026
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Alex Knight | 2001-06-27 21:20:28 | Re: Re: Red Hat to support PostgreSQL |
| Previous Message | Trond Eivind =?iso-8859-1?q?Glomsr=F8d?= | 2001-06-27 21:16:12 | Re: Re: Red Hat to support PostgreSQL |