Re: [HACKERS] Deferred trigger queue

From: wieck(at)debis(dot)com (Jan Wieck)
To: Thomas Lockhart <lockhart(at)alumni(dot)caltech(dot)edu>
Cc: Jan Wieck <wieck(at)debis(dot)com>, PostgreSQL HACKERS <pgsql-hackers(at)postgreSQL(dot)org>
Subject: Re: [HACKERS] Deferred trigger queue
Date: 2000-02-08 19:33:16
Message-ID: m12IGNw-0003kdC@orion.SAPserv.Hamburg.dsh.de
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

> And btw, I've got most of the regression tests passing with a first
> cut at outer join syntax, but the rules system has breakage. Should be
> OK after another pass through to clean up code, which is likely to
> touch many files since a bit of the RTE structure changes.
>
> I'd have gone ahead and committed, but figured that breaking foreign
> keys would not be a step ahead for Jan ;)

FOREIGN KEYs aren't related to rules in any way. They are
implemented as triggers. So break the rule system for a while
if you feel the need.

Jan

--

#======================================================================#
# It's easier to get forgiveness for being wrong than for being right. #
# Let's break this rule - forgive me. #
#========================================= wieck(at)debis(dot)com (Jan Wieck) #

In response to

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Jan Wieck 2000-02-08 19:35:30 Re: [HACKERS] docs and createlang patch for plperl
Previous Message Don Baccus 2000-02-08 19:26:16 Re: [HACKERS] Ordering of pg_dump output