From: | wieck(at)debis(dot)com (Jan Wieck) |
---|---|
To: | tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us (Tom Lane) |
Cc: | wieck(at)debis(dot)com, kyle(at)actarg(dot)com, pgsql-hackers(at)postgreSQL(dot)org |
Subject: | Re: [HACKERS] TLE subselects (was: Raising funds for PostgreSQL) |
Date: | 1999-12-07 04:07:17 |
Message-ID: | m11vBuH-0003kIC@orion.SAPserv.Hamburg.dsh.de |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
Tom Lane wrote:
> wieck(at)debis(dot)com (Jan Wieck) writes:
>
> > Uh,
> > who did the latter one?
>
> > So I assume it's not implemented in the form I outlined - the
> > subselecting range table entry. I'll take a look at it the
> > next days and maybe complain about that change if it
> > interferes with the needs of the rule system to make
> > aggregate, distinct, group by, sort by and all the other
> > (long wanted) view stuff possible.
>
> I don't believe this has anything to do with subselects as range
> table entries. That facility will be quite separate from subselects
> in expressions, no?
Now that you say it...
Yes, they are separate. They don't interfere.
Thank's for the *slap* - sometimes I need that :-).
Jan
--
#======================================================================#
# It's easier to get forgiveness for being wrong than for being right. #
# Let's break this rule - forgive me. #
#========================================= wieck(at)debis(dot)com (Jan Wieck) #
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Bruce Momjian | 1999-12-07 04:12:30 | Re: [HACKERS] When is 7.0 going Beta? |
Previous Message | Hiroshi Inoue | 1999-12-07 04:03:28 | RE: [HACKERS] FOREIGN KEY and shift/reduce |