From: | wieck(at)debis(dot)com (Jan Wieck) |
---|---|
To: | tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us (Tom Lane) |
Cc: | grzegorz_przezdziecki(at)lupus(dot)waw(dot)pl, pgsql-hackers(at)postgreSQL(dot)org |
Subject: | Re: [HACKERS] Problem with new function |
Date: | 1999-09-23 15:13:19 |
Message-ID: | m11UAYh-0003kLC@orion.SAPserv.Hamburg.dsh.de |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
>
> Grzegorz =?iso-8859-2?Q?Prze=BCdziecki?= <grzegorz_przezdziecki(at)lupus(dot)waw(dot)pl> writes:
> > in may log file :
> > Fatal 1 : btree: cannot split if start (2) >= maxoff (2)
> > or somethings like this:
> > fatal 1: my bits moved right off the end of the world!
>
> I think we fixed some bugs in that area in 6.5.2 --- please update
> and see if the problem is still there.
The pg_proc_prosrc_index (causing this failure) is still
there. If I remember right, something on SQL functions
requires this index to quickly find a particular function BY
SOURCE. Seems a little screwed up.
Jan
--
#======================================================================#
# It's easier to get forgiveness for being wrong than for being right. #
# Let's break this rule - forgive me. #
#========================================= wieck(at)debis(dot)com (Jan Wieck) #
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Jan Wieck | 1999-09-23 15:28:51 | Re: [HACKERS] Progress report: buffer refcount bugs and SQL functions |
Previous Message | Jan Wieck | 1999-09-23 15:07:13 | RI and NULL's |