Re: [HACKERS] Problem with new function

From: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
To: Grzegorz Przeździecki <grzegorz_przezdziecki(at)lupus(dot)waw(dot)pl>
Cc: pgsql-hackers(at)postgreSQL(dot)org
Subject: Re: [HACKERS] Problem with new function
Date: 1999-09-23 14:53:10
Message-ID: 14225.938098390@sss.pgh.pa.us
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

Grzegorz =?iso-8859-2?Q?Prze=BCdziecki?= <grzegorz_przezdziecki(at)lupus(dot)waw(dot)pl> writes:
> in may log file :
> Fatal 1 : btree: cannot split if start (2) >= maxoff (2)
> or somethings like this:
> fatal 1: my bits moved right off the end of the world!

I think we fixed some bugs in that area in 6.5.2 --- please update
and see if the problem is still there.

Note you will probably need to dump / drop / restore your database
to get that index back into an uncorrupted state :-(

regards, tom lane

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Adriaan Joubert 1999-09-23 14:56:56 Re: [HACKERS] Operator definitions
Previous Message Tom Lane 1999-09-23 14:51:10 Re: [HACKERS] Progress report: buffer refcount bugs and SQL functions