Re: [HACKERS] Postgres Speed or lack thereof

From: jwieck(at)debis(dot)com (Jan Wieck)
To: tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us (Tom Lane)
Cc: jwieck(at)debis(dot)com, hackers(at)postgreSQL(dot)org
Subject: Re: [HACKERS] Postgres Speed or lack thereof
Date: 1999-02-02 15:34:06
Message-ID: m107hq4-000EBPC@orion.SAPserv.Hamburg.dsh.de
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

>
> jwieck(at)debis(dot)com (Jan Wieck) writes:
> > [ patch to handle small-block allocation specially ]
> > Did anyone play around with it? I've had it installed now for
> > some days and it work's well so far.
> > How close are we to v6.5 BETA? Should I apply it to CURRENT?
>
> Well, I think it's a band-aid until we can redesign the memory manager
> properly, but it could be a useful band-aid ... might as well put it in.
>
> The only thing that bothers me about the code itself is lack of
> comments. In particular it'd be nice to mention somewhere that freeptr
> is actually one chunkheader past the start of the free space --- took
> a while to puzzle that out.

Tricky eh? The AllocSet...() functions do it the same so it
just continues with that style.

But you're right, and when moving it in I'll shurely add
comments.

Jan

--

#======================================================================#
# It's easier to get forgiveness for being wrong than for being right. #
# Let's break this rule - forgive me. #
#======================================== jwieck(at)debis(dot)com (Jan Wieck) #

In response to

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message The Hermit Hacker 1999-02-02 15:51:08 Re: [HACKERS] Postgres Speed or lack thereof
Previous Message Jan Wieck 1999-02-02 15:29:38 Re: [HACKERS] VACUUM ANALYZE failed on linux