Re: [HACKERS] Postgres Speed or lack thereof

From: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
To: jwieck(at)debis(dot)com (Jan Wieck)
Cc: hackers(at)postgreSQL(dot)org
Subject: Re: [HACKERS] Postgres Speed or lack thereof
Date: 1999-02-02 15:27:02
Message-ID: 22529.917969222@sss.pgh.pa.us
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

jwieck(at)debis(dot)com (Jan Wieck) writes:
> [ patch to handle small-block allocation specially ]
> Did anyone play around with it? I've had it installed now for
> some days and it work's well so far.
> How close are we to v6.5 BETA? Should I apply it to CURRENT?

Well, I think it's a band-aid until we can redesign the memory manager
properly, but it could be a useful band-aid ... might as well put it in.

The only thing that bothers me about the code itself is lack of
comments. In particular it'd be nice to mention somewhere that freeptr
is actually one chunkheader past the start of the free space --- took
a while to puzzle that out.

regards, tom lane

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Jan Wieck 1999-02-02 15:29:38 Re: [HACKERS] VACUUM ANALYZE failed on linux
Previous Message jose' soares 1999-02-02 15:25:19 Re: [SQL] Re: [HACKERS] Re: SELECT DISTINCT ON ... ORDER BY ...