Re: pg_stat_statements and "IN" conditions

From: Dmitry Dolgov <9erthalion6(at)gmail(dot)com>
To: Sami Imseih <samimseih(at)gmail(dot)com>
Cc: Álvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)alvh(dot)no-ip(dot)org>, Julien Rouhaud <rjuju123(at)gmail(dot)com>, Kirill Reshke <reshkekirill(at)gmail(dot)com>, Sergei Kornilov <sk(at)zsrv(dot)org>, yasuo(dot)honda(at)gmail(dot)com, tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us, smithpb2250(at)gmail(dot)com, vignesh21(at)gmail(dot)com, michael(at)paquier(dot)xyz, nathandbossart(at)gmail(dot)com, stark(dot)cfm(at)gmail(dot)com, geidav(dot)pg(at)gmail(dot)com, marcos(at)f10(dot)com(dot)br, robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com, david(at)pgmasters(dot)net, pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org, pavel(dot)trukhanov(at)gmail(dot)com, Sutou Kouhei <kou(at)clear-code(dot)com>
Subject: Re: pg_stat_statements and "IN" conditions
Date: 2025-03-19 07:32:55
Message-ID: i6dghpoom6ec6lz3ngfj5yisdrhxa3uhxbhbfy45llqwkpsdgj@qd7ydqsmxehh
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

> On Tue, Mar 18, 2025 at 02:54:18PM GMT, Sami Imseih wrote:
> I want to mention that the current patch does not deal
> with external parameters ( prepared statements ) [0] [1]. This could be a
> follow-up, as it may need some further discussion. It is important to
> address this case, IMO.

Sure, it's important and I'm planning to tackle this next. If you want,
we can collaborate on a patch for that.

In response to

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Ilia Evdokimov 2025-03-19 07:57:00 Re: Add missing tab completion for VACUUM and ANALYZE with ONLY option
Previous Message Dmitry Dolgov 2025-03-19 07:31:15 Re: pg_stat_statements and "IN" conditions