Re: pg_stat_statements and "IN" conditions

From: Sami Imseih <samimseih(at)gmail(dot)com>
To: Álvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)alvh(dot)no-ip(dot)org>
Cc: Dmitry Dolgov <9erthalion6(at)gmail(dot)com>, Julien Rouhaud <rjuju123(at)gmail(dot)com>, Kirill Reshke <reshkekirill(at)gmail(dot)com>, Sergei Kornilov <sk(at)zsrv(dot)org>, yasuo(dot)honda(at)gmail(dot)com, tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us, smithpb2250(at)gmail(dot)com, vignesh21(at)gmail(dot)com, michael(at)paquier(dot)xyz, nathandbossart(at)gmail(dot)com, stark(dot)cfm(at)gmail(dot)com, geidav(dot)pg(at)gmail(dot)com, marcos(at)f10(dot)com(dot)br, robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com, david(at)pgmasters(dot)net, pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org, pavel(dot)trukhanov(at)gmail(dot)com, Sutou Kouhei <kou(at)clear-code(dot)com>
Subject: Re: pg_stat_statements and "IN" conditions
Date: 2025-03-18 18:54:18
Message-ID: CAA5RZ0s8Nr7SMfSTsioAuSWjbfqrGziPTFYK=W6g6WyRUdbz2Q@mail.gmail.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

I want to mention that the current patch does not deal
with external parameters ( prepared statements ) [0] [1]. This could be a
follow-up, as it may need some further discussion. It is important to
address this case, IMO.

[0]
https://www.postgresql.org/message-id/CAA5RZ0uGfxXyzhp9N5nfsS%2BZqF5ngEMC3YtBPtLoeK8EPsjHbw%40mail.gmail.com

[1]
https://www.postgresql.org/message-id/blauoky77sash2qzrbnz6ilfyi7odtvxtdr4ifg4hq4bpqp2uk%406z5yjfsxtcnl

Regards,

Sami

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Jeff Davis 2025-03-18 18:54:46 Re: Update Unicode data to Unicode 16.0.0
Previous Message Robert Haas 2025-03-18 18:49:05 Re: Add -k/--link option to pg_combinebackup