Re: Super-smack?

From: "Steve Woodcock" <steve(dot)woodcock(at)gmail(dot)com>
To: "Scott Sipe" <cscotts(at)mindspring(dot)com>
Cc: pgsql-performance(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: Super-smack?
Date: 2006-05-01 13:06:44
Message-ID: ff68c4ad0605010606k1f8147d8ue6b650b05958d562@mail.gmail.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-performance

On 01/05/06, Scott Sipe <cscotts(at)mindspring(dot)com> wrote:
> So, my question is, before I do any further digging, is super-smack
> flawed?

Hmm, selects and updates of a 90k row table using the primary key, but
no sign of a VACUUM ANALYZE...

Cheers, Steve Woodcock

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-performance by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Tom Lane 2006-05-01 15:15:19 Re: Super-smack?
Previous Message Steinar H. Gunderson 2006-05-01 11:54:49 Re: Super-smack?