Super-smack?

From: Scott Sipe <cscotts(at)mindspring(dot)com>
To: pgsql-performance(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Super-smack?
Date: 2006-05-01 08:05:54
Message-ID: 92F10BE1-B193-4EEA-877A-9260B55C2844@mindspring.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-performance


I've been attempting to tweak performance on a FreeBSD 6 server I'm
running that has both Postgresql 8.1 and Mysql 4.1 running
simultaneously.

To attempt to gauge performance I was directed to the super-smack
(http://vegan.net/tony/supersmack/) benchmark.

Testing gave results that showed mysql far outperforming postgresql
in select and update tests, in factors of roughly 6-7x in terms of
queries per second (running stock configurations--I was able to
improve mysql performance a good amount with playing with the config
file settings, though I couldn't make any change in postgresql
performance. I DID increase shmmin shmmax and semmap during the
course of testing).

So, my question is, before I do any further digging, is super-smack
flawed? It's very possibile I'm doing something stupid with the
execution of the benchmark too, but as I said, I just wanted to see
if anyone else had used super-smack, or had comments? I'm glad to
post system specs, configs, etc, if anyone is interested.

Alternatively, would anyone recommend any other benchmarks to run?

thanks much,
Scott

I also wanted to make clear I didn't want to turn this into a mysql
vs postgresql discussion, as I much prefer postgresql.

Responses

Browse pgsql-performance by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message mlartz@gmail.com 2006-05-01 11:35:20 Re: Easy question
Previous Message Dave Dutcher 2006-05-01 00:36:11 Re: query performance question