| From: | Peter Eisentraut <peter(dot)eisentraut(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com> |
|---|---|
| To: | Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com> |
| Cc: | David Rowley <david(dot)rowley(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>, PostgreSQL-development <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
| Subject: | Re: Functions Immutable but not parallel safe? |
| Date: | 2017-04-06 18:31:53 |
| Message-ID: | fd99bfaf-7047-c4ae-8d19-ec4b7ac23b11@2ndquadrant.com |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
On 4/5/17 12:26, Robert Haas wrote:
> On Wed, Apr 5, 2017 at 12:18 PM, Peter Eisentraut
> <peter(dot)eisentraut(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com> wrote:
>> On 4/5/17 09:58, Robert Haas wrote:
>>>> - Maybe add a check to opr_sanity to make sure the default set of
>>>> functions is configured the way we want?
>>> That seems like a good idea.
>>
>> patch
>
> LGTM
committed
--
Peter Eisentraut http://www.2ndQuadrant.com/
PostgreSQL Development, 24x7 Support, Remote DBA, Training & Services
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Pavel Stehule | 2017-04-06 18:32:35 | Re: PoC plpgsql - possibility to force custom or generic plan |
| Previous Message | Peter Eisentraut | 2017-04-06 18:23:47 | Re: [GENERAL] C++ port of Postgres |