Re: Functions Immutable but not parallel safe?

From: Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com>
To: Peter Eisentraut <peter(dot)eisentraut(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>
Cc: David Rowley <david(dot)rowley(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>, PostgreSQL-development <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: Functions Immutable but not parallel safe?
Date: 2017-04-05 16:26:49
Message-ID: CA+Tgmob_RwL=H6iimtF8LtSC4C=L2=PxCDxTd1ONiFKtKp+ihw@mail.gmail.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On Wed, Apr 5, 2017 at 12:18 PM, Peter Eisentraut
<peter(dot)eisentraut(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com> wrote:
> On 4/5/17 09:58, Robert Haas wrote:
>>> - Maybe add a check to opr_sanity to make sure the default set of
>>> functions is configured the way we want?
>> That seems like a good idea.
>
> patch

LGTM

--
Robert Haas
EnterpriseDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com
The Enterprise PostgreSQL Company

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Tom Lane 2017-04-05 16:29:34 Re: Functions Immutable but not parallel safe?
Previous Message Tom Lane 2017-04-05 16:26:25 Re: partitioned tables and contrib/sepgsql