From: | Jeff Davis <pgsql(at)j-davis(dot)com> |
---|---|
To: | Peter Eisentraut <peter(dot)eisentraut(at)enterprisedb(dot)com>, Pavel Stehule <pavel(dot)stehule(at)gmail(dot)com> |
Cc: | Andres Freund <andres(at)anarazel(dot)de>, Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>, Thomas Munro <thomas(dot)munro(at)gmail(dot)com>, Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com>, pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org |
Subject: | Re: Move defaults toward ICU in 16? |
Date: | 2023-02-20 19:41:52 |
Message-ID: | fd86b104f967e28c733167571551652e0d1a7d28.camel@j-davis.com |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
On Mon, 2023-02-20 at 15:55 +0100, Peter Eisentraut wrote:
> I'm confused. We are not going to try to change existing databases
> to a
> different collation provider during pg_upgrade, are we?
No, certainly not.
I interpreted Pavel's comments as a comparison of ICU and libc in
general and not specific to this patch. Changing providers obviously
requires an index rebuild to be safe.
--
Jeff Davis
PostgreSQL Contributor Team - AWS
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Andres Freund | 2023-02-20 19:42:49 | Re: meson: Non-feature feature options |
Previous Message | Tom Lane | 2023-02-20 19:39:59 | Re: Missing cases from SPI_result_code_string() |